About 861,000 results
- In his 1980 journal article, Langdon Winner argues that artifacts, intended as technical objects, have political properties and embody forms of authority and subordination12. Winner states that technological artifacts within themselves do not possess an agenda, but they can contain political properties in two ways: (1) a technical device or system is used to settle a community issue, and (2) man-made systems requiring or compatible with certain types of political relations3.Learn more:✕This summary was generated using AI based on multiple online sources. To view the original source information, use the "Learn more" links.In this journal article published in 1980, Winner claims that that artifacts, intended as technical objects, have political properties and embody forms of authority and subordination.francescoimola.medium.com/do-artifacts-have-polit…“Do Artifacts Have Politics?” is a provocative piece written by Langdon Winner that explores the explicit and implicit political properties within technological artifacts. Similar to Leo Marx’s piece, “Technology: The Emergence of a Hazardous Concept,” Winner states that technological artifacts within themselves do not possess an agenda.sites.psu.edu/arc597a/2013/04/15/tran-do-artifacts …Two ways in which technical artifacts can contain political properties are described: (1) a technical device or system is used to settle a community issue, and (2) man-made systems requiring or compatible with certain types of political relations.www.osti.gov/biblio/5525771
- People also ask
Do Artifacts Have Politics? on JSTOR
Explore further
“Do Artifacts Have Politics?” by Langdon Winner. A reflection.
12 Do Artifacts Have Politics? - IEEE Xplore
Do Artifacts Have Politics? | 21 | Computer Ethics | Langdon Winner
Langdon Winner, Do artifacts have politics? - PhilPapers
[PDF] Do Artifacts Have Politics? | Semantic Scholar
Langdon Winner - Wikipedia
Related searches for Do Artifacts Have Politics?
- Some results have been removed